Skip to main content
    Continuous Agentic Assurance for Enterprise AI

    We run the platform,
    do the work, and prove it.

    The upgrade that keeps slipping. The security finding still open. The AI your engineers already adopted, with nothing around it.

    We do not need to operate your tooling for Reign Factory to work inside it. Your checks, your approvals and your release path still decide what ships.

    Inside your trust boundary six outcomes, four blocks
    What you are here for
    Upgrades that keep slipping
    Delivery the business is waiting on
    Agents in production
    AI in your engineers’ workflows
    Prove it to a regulator
    Cloud and AI spend
    Your cloud account
    OperateReign Ops
    BuildReign Factory
    GovernReign Gateway
    AssureReign Assurance
    Merge requests in your repository, on your change control Work that was waiting reaches your reviewers in one shape Agents with an identity, a place to run, and a record Agent work that scales, and one boundary on every model call Who authorized the action, and the evidence beside it Spend attributed to environments, teams and workloads
    Memberships and designations Linux Foundation FINOS Agentic AI Foundation AWS Advanced Tier & Validated MSP SOC 2 Type II
    Tenure
    21 years operating critical infrastructure
    Mapped to
    NIST SSDF · NIST AI RMF · SOC 2 · ISO 27001 · ISO 42001
    Yours by default
    Your repository, your checks, your approval policy
    What we measured on our own engineering

    326 merged changes in a month. Two engineers.

    Around 99% of implementation on our own codebase runs through Reign Factory. The month below came from a two-person team setting the work up and validating what came back. That is the merged volume of a median team roughly thirteen times its size, at a quarter of the industry median time-to-merge.

    326
    Merged merge requests in one month, across eight of our own repositories. Every one with a named approval.
    19 h
    Median open-to-merge, against an 83 h published industry median. 58% merge inside a day.
    ~99%
    Of implementation run through the Factory. Engineers plan and validate; the Factory builds.
    Read the denominator. Measured on Reign's own engineering, 11 July to 11 August 2026: the GitLab engineering group, being the Reign gateway repository and seven satellites, with CI release commits excluded and automated approvals filtered out of the approval count. Of the 326, 228 were planned and validated by an engineer and 98 ran end to end under our own policy for that class of work. Benchmarks are LinearB's 2025 engineering benchmarks (83 h median across 6.1M pull requests) and GitKraken's 2026 targets (elite under 48 h). Merge request counts do not capture change size, so cycle time is the more direct comparison. Internal environment only, and not a customer result. Your conversation starts from your own baseline, agreed before anything runs. What we measured →
    How the work reaches you

    Your backlog in. A merge-ready change out.

    Reign Factory works the item it is assigned in an isolated environment, with Reign Gateway on the model path, then hands a merge-ready change to your own path: a merge request, which is a pull request in GitHub terms. Everything after the handover is the process you already run.

    Reign Factory · operated for you
    Your software project · your controls, unchanged
    Eligibility
    The rules you set for what it may touch. Tested, and visible to you.
    Isolated worker
    One item, one bounded environment.
    Gateway and checks
    Policy at the boundary. Build and test first.
    Merge request
    Opened in your repository, carrying its findings.
    Your checks
    Your pipeline, unchanged.
    Review and approval
    The stages you run. Your policy decides.
    Merge and release
    Your rules, your process.
    Stops and hands over Out of scope · a required check fails · it isn’t making progress
    The item goes to a named person and stays with them. It does not push through.
    It works only on what you assign it. Eligibility rules decide what it may touch, and the rule that refused an item is visible to you.
    It stops rather than pushing through. Out of scope, a required check fails, or it isn’t making progress. It hands over to a named person.
    Your policy decides. Review, approval, merge and release stay yours. Adoption is additive; your pipeline keeps its wiring.
    What you are buying

    Operate. Build. Govern. Assure.

    Reign operates the toolchain, governs every model call at one boundary, does the engineering work inside it, and produces the record your risk and compliance teams read. Four capabilities, each bought on its own. Nothing here requires the other three. Two of the four are available today.

    Operate

    Reign Ops

    The managed engineering tools and open source estate, operated for you as a single-tenant dedicated instance: source control, CI/CD, work tracking, and the model access layer your engineers build on.

    What you get. Someone answers the pager, and upgrades happen to your change control instead of accumulating.
    Build

    Reign Factory

    AI-enabled engineering work contributed into your own software delivery process. It works the items you assign it in an isolated environment and opens merge requests that enter your approval path.

    What you get. Work that was waiting starts moving, and reaches your reviewers in the same shape every time.
    Available · Beta Release See the delivery path →
    Govern

    Reign Gateway

    Policy, model routing and monitoring at the call boundary, for Reign Factory and for the agents your own teams wrote, with a record of what it authorized.

    What you get. One place where AI policy is enforced rather than documented, and a record only you could rewrite. Run for you as a managed outcome, not a component you operate.
    Available today One boundary, any agent →
    Assure

    Reign Assurance

    Requirements become checks, and every check states what a pass can establish. A check that does not pass on a material action holds it until a named person disposes it under a recorded mandate.

    What you get. Bounded results on work you have named, with what was not assessed stated beside what was. An evidence package with a verifier that runs outside Reign. It is evidence, not an audit opinion.
    Co-design development Co-design it with us →

    What operates today is dated in the product status register, and what each published figure was measured on is at what we measured.

    What risk and compliance will ask for

    Named instruments, not a logo wall.

    Mapping to your internal framework is joint work with your compliance function and counsel. iTmethods does not issue an audit opinion or a certification, and the register says so on the rows where we have no mechanism yet.

    NIST SSDF · SP 800-218 with SP 800-218A

    Secure development practice, including for generative AI.

    NIST AI RMF 1.0, with the Generative AI Profile

    Structures the AI governance and risk questions an engagement answers.

    SOC 2 TSC and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A

    Control objectives are mapped, and we walk your control function through the register row by row.

    ISO/IEC 42001, EU AI Act, OSFI Guideline E-23

    Built to support your obligations under each, applied as an engagement overlay where your jurisdiction makes it relevant.

    How you work with us

    Software we operate, and engineers who stay.

    We are not only a product company and not a consultancy. Some of what you buy is an operated product; some is an outcome delivered by our engineers working inside your organization. Which one you need depends on the capability, and we say so before anything is signed.

    Operated product

    We run it, you use it. Reign Ops as a dedicated single-tenant estate, operated to your change control.

    Who does the work. Our engineers, on our pager, against your change windows.
    Embedded outcome

    Our engineers, inside your team. A Factory engagement is not a license hand-off. Our engineers embed with yours to configure eligibility, wire the integrations and work the first items alongside them.

    Who does the work. Ours and yours together, until the eligibility rules settle.
    Co-design

    Build the assurance with us. Reign Assurance is being built with the control functions that will have to rely on it: which checks, which exceptions, in whose format.

    Who does the work. Your risk and compliance teams and our engineers, jointly, on a named scope.
    1

    Scope

    One repository, one delivery path and a defined item population.

    2

    Agree the rules

    Eligibility, access, required checks, stop conditions, approval policy and reviewer capacity.

    3

    Set the baseline

    Accepted changes, cycle time, rework, cost and reviewer effort, defined before the run, not after.

    4

    Run and decide

    Completed work, measures against that baseline, and a written recommendation to continue, narrow or stop.

    What it asks of your reviewers. Capacity gained in implementation arrives as work for your reviewers. Someone reads every merge request Reign Factory opens, and the first weeks ask more of them while the eligibility rules settle.
    What runs where. Each customer runs on a dedicated single-tenant instance. Your identity provider, network policy, key management and logging govern the deployment.
    The ask

    Bring us meaningful work.

    The alternatives are hiring another six engineers, buying an assistant and hoping, or carrying it another quarter. Bring us one repository and one delivery path instead, with measures agreed before anything runs.

    If the estate itself is the problem, start there instead: have us operate it.